On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 08:21:14AM -0700, Ben Reser wrote: > On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Rick Moen <r...@linuxmafia.com> wrote: > > Er, the licence steward's opinion on that substantive legal question > > (such as it is) strikes me as lacking relevance. Either the licence as > > a work is copyrightable in accordance with its own separate nature, or > > it isn't. The judge isn't going to ask the licence steward what he/she > > thinks, but instead will analyse the work. > > It's not likely to be in front of a judge if the license steward says that.
I think you mean it's not likely to be in front of a judge if the license steward *means* that. If the license steward *says* it, but doesn't really mean it (or changes his/her mind), (s)he may try suing anyway. -- Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
