Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> writes: >Based on the discussions we've had here over the second half of 2012, >I've published a revised version of opensource.org/licenses this >morning. > >A few minor tweaks were made to the last draft based on comments here; >the biggest being a reference to the FAQ and inclusion of several >questions from the FAQ. I've also included a reference to the >proliferation report so that it is more clear how the list of >"popular", etc. was arrived at, and strengthened the language around >the links to the complete lists so that it is more clear that those >licenses are also approved and usable. > >The page is still a work in progress, in two ways: > >1) Cosmetically: suggestions on grammar, layout, or uncontroversial >content (e.g., adding links to other FAQ questions; otherwise beefing >up the content) are still very welcome, either in this thread or by >personal email. > >2) Substantively: as has been pointed out and discussed at length, the >current categories could stand revision, probably including more >objective criteria. PLEASE do not use this thread to discuss that >issue. If you have specific, concrete, suggestions, please start new >threads, or respond to my older thread on objective criteria.
FWIW, I think the new landing page is terrific, and about a trajillion times more useful to newcomers than the old landing page was. Nice job! -Karl _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss