On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Engel Nyst <engel.n...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Unfortunately, it is not possible for OSI to review every variation, >> so we cannot say if a given variation is approved. > > From "not every", it does not follow logically "not any". I don't doubt > the premise is true, but the second does not follow from it alone. > But perhaps there is no need to go all the way, for minor differences > and existing use...: it is not approved, but sometimes it is discussed > and no reasons are raised, which would probably make it rejected. > (apart from reasons unrelated to its FOSS appropriate status) > With all other disclaimers needed... but if it's true, perhaps there is a > way to say it.
You can't be expected to review _every_ variation, but you can review the ones that occur most frequently that are almost a match for the license. -- --dmg --- Daniel M. German http://turingmachine.org _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
