Luis Villa <l...@tieguy.org> writes: >What's the state of robots.txt and the wiki? If this page will be >showing up in search results, I'd like it to slightly clearly identify >itself as a brainstorm that is not endorsed/approved.
I modified the page to be clear about that. (We don't have a robots.txt for the wiki, but I don't think we need one either -- pages should be searchable, and they should say their status accurately). >I'd also like to reemphasize that I think this is a can of worms that >I personally don't think we have the focus/organization to tackle >effectively yet. I haven't seen anything in this thread that changes >my mind on that yet. Actually, I agree. But no reason not to have the materials in the wiki -- that way you and I can be wrong without having damaged anything :-). _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
