On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 7:11 AM, John Cowan <co...@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:
> More than ever this license needs a justification in detail of its sparse
> differences from Apache.

To be clear, the license must be submitted following the rules at
http://opensource.org/approval - including:

1. Submit before final, whenever possible, to allow for revisions
based on feedback
**2. Clearly state rationale for a new license**
**3. Compare to and contrast with the most similar OSI-approved license(s)**
4. Provide results of any legal analysis available
**5. Recommend which license proliferation category is appropriate**

License-discuss mailing list

Reply via email to