MURAKAMI, Keiko wrote:
When we deliver our application just as Web application, by using but not
If you deliver the actual application, then all the licences apply.
If you only deliver a service, many licences don't impose restrictions,
however, you should carefully read all the licenses and consult a lawyer
if there is any doubt.
(Some recent licences have taken the position that this is a loophole
and have tried to close it.)
distributing the libraries, should we distribute it under GPL?
Should we be ready to show the complete source code to any user?
That would be respecting the spirit of open source, but may not always
be legally necessary if the user never receives a copy of even the
binary version of the code.
The application is not static linked.
I'm not sure whether this is the right place to ask, but I appreciate your
help.
The right place to ask is your lawyer's office!
--
David Woolley
Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want.
RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam,
that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
