Bradley M. Kuhn scripsit: > Richard Fontana pointed out in his OSCON talk that license choosers > generally make political statements about views of licenses. He used > the GitHub chooser as an example, which subtly pushes people toward > permissive licenses.
Surely he jests. Choosealicense.com *blatantly* pushes people toward the MIT license. I don't believe, however, that my chooser <http://ccil.org/~cowan/floss> has any such biases. Certainly I myself have no skin in the permissive/GPL game, though I am against non-GPL non-permissive licenses because they create islands in the overall software commons. The GPL commons, like Australia, is too big to be called an island. -- Principles. You can't say A is John Cowan <co...@ccil.org> made of B or vice versa. All mass http://www.ccil.org/~cowan is interaction. --Richard Feynman _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
