Rick Moen wrote at 16:55 (EDT) on Friday:
> You seem to be trying to imply without saying so that the
> source-access obligations of copyleft licences somehow give you
> additional rights in other areas _other_ than source acccess. What
> I'm saying is, no, that's just not the case.
GPL (and other copylefts too) *do* give other rights downstream, beyond
source access, of course.
While I really disagree with how Al has been raising these suspicions,
*if* Al has any valid argument [0], it would relate to other provisions
of GPL, and not the source-code provisions in GPLv2§3 and GPLv3§6.
[0] And, to be clear to those who seem to have missed this point: I
*don't* agree with Al's accusations/insinuations. In fact, I'm
arguing against them, in case you missed it.
--
-- bkuhn
_______________________________________________
License-discuss mailing list
License-discuss@opensource.org
http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
