Care to propose an improvement?
On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 7:37 PM, lro...@rosenlaw.com <lro...@rosenlaw.com>wrote: > "Standard" is a loaded term. Licenses are not standards and OSI is not a > standards organization. Larry > > > Sent from my smartphone > > > -------- Original message -------- > From: Luis Villa > Date:04/27/2014 6:11 PM (GMT-08:00) > To: License Discuss > Subject: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why > standard licenses"? > > Hi, all- > > A few of us were talking and realized the FAQ/website have nothing to > explain why *using standard licenses* is a good idea. This being a sort of > basic point, I started remedying the problem :) > > Draft FAQ entry addressing the question is here: > http://wiki.opensource.org/bin/Projects/Why+standardized+licensing%3F > > There is also an incomplete potential more-than-FAQ answer that could be > put somewhere on opensource.org. The more I think about it, the more I > think the FAQ may be sufficient, but I'd be curious what others here think > and whether something longer is worthwhile. > > Feedback is probably better on-wiki but the list is fine too. :) > Luis > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss > > -- Simon Phipps*, OSI President* +44 238 098 7027 or +1 415 683 7660 : www.opensource.org
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
