Hi, Is this better than the original MIT license ? It has patent grants which MIT lacks.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Copyright (c) <year> <copyright holders> Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, and under any and all copyright and patent rights owned or freely licensable by each licensor hereunder, whether an original author or another licensor, to any person obtaining a copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal in current and future versions of the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights to make, use, copy, modify, merge, link, sell, offer for sale, import, export, have made, have sold, publish, display, perform, create derivative works of, distribute, redistribute, sub-license the Software, in source or object form, and to permit persons to whom the Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: The above copyright/patent notice and this permission notice shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software. THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE SOFTWARE. _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
