David Woolley scripsit: > It might be needed because it has become important to integrate the > work with work under and otherwise incompatible open source licence. > In the past, I think it has been necessary to remove contributions > from a minor contributor, to achieve this, because they were unable or > unwilling to licence it under the new licence.
Or so people believe, anyway, and tend to act as if true. At least some people think that a co-author can relicense ad libitum at least under U.S. copyright law. -- John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org Micropayment advocates mistakenly believe that efficient allocation of resources is the purpose of markets. Efficiency is a byproduct of market systems, not their goal. The reasons markets work are not because users have embraced efficiency but because markets are the best place to allow users to maximize their preferences, and very often their preferences are not for conservation of cheap resources. --Clay Shirky _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
