Quoting co...@ccil.org (co...@ccil.org): > I think the objection is that by copying the PHP license into a > codebase that isn't PHP, one is forced to utter a falsehood by > the terms of the license, one of which is "This is PHP". But > I don't see any reason to think that when you are forced to copy > a license verbatim, you are necessarily standing behind any and all > statements in that license.
Quite so. It is in the grand tradition of debian-legal to bring up such objectiosn, even if the defects being discussed are mere blemishes and non-fatal to the legal intent. I actually appreciate them doing so, as they have a point even if it is not of dire importance. -- Cheers, A Spanish todo list has everything. Rick Moen -- Matt Watson (@biorhythmist) r...@linuxmafia.com McQ! (4x80) _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
