The wtfpl both isn't copyleft, nor is it a valid copyright license for software. On Mar 30, 2015 4:23 PM, "jonathon" <jonathon.bl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30/03/15 07:40, Tim Makarios wrote > > Publication Licence [1], which a more careful (automated) word-count > measures at nearly 800 words. > > Isn't the DWTFYL license shorter? > (I can't override the NSFW search on my browser, to find a copy of that > license.) > > jonathon > > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org http://projects.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
