The zlib license is OSI-approved and does not require attribution: http://opensource.org/licenses/Zlib
On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Sagar <sagar.writ...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > Is there a short permissive OSI approved license that doesn't require > attribution? > > The popular permissive open source licenses like MIT and BSD require > attribution. It would be good to have a license where that is not required. > There are many of us who are happy with attribution but don't want to > legally enforce it. Here is an example of a popular library using public > domain dedication with a fallback license: > > https://github.com/nothings/stb/blob/master/stb_vorbis.c > > I propose a public domain dedication with a BSD-style fallback without the > attribution requirement: > > "This software is in the public domain. Where that dedication is not > recognized, redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with > or without modification, are permitted. No warranty for any purpose > is expressed or implied." > > Is the public domain dedication redundant? Will it suffice to just say > "redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without > modification, are permitted" ? > > Thanks, > Sagar > > _______________________________________________ > License-discuss mailing list > License-discuss@opensource.org > https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss > >
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss