On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 12:19 PM, Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> wrote:
Do you have a citation to support that please? A quick web search did not > identify one, but obviously it's a big web out there. > I don't, but it was on one of the OSI mailing lists during the discussion of the Brode license (which ended up not being approved). The Brode license provided that any pre-existing patent grant by MIT pre-empted rights granted under the license, which a lot of us really didn't like -- what, is MIT so incompetent they haven't kept track of what patent licenses they have issued? Apprarently so. At that point several of us pointed out that the much older MIT license already contained a universal patent grant; the MIT folks said "We never meant it to." -- John Cowan http://vrici.lojban.org/~cowan co...@ccil.org We call nothing profound that is not wittily expressed. --Northrop Frye (improved)
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
