On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2017, 11:07 AM Luis Villa <l...@lu.is> wrote: >> >> Hey, all- >> I promised some board members a summary of my investigation in '12-'13 >> into updating, supplementing, or replacing the "popular licenses" list. Here >> goes. [...] > Yet another (inevitably flawed) data set: > https://libraries.io/licenses
With the merit that the all the underlying code is FLOSS. Another possible source --always biased-- could be Debian's popcon and some cross ref with debsources. -- Cordially Philippe Ombredanne _______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
