> -----Original Message----- > From: License-discuss [mailto:license-discuss-boun...@opensource.org] On > Behalf Of Tzeng, Nigel H. > Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2017 2:32 PM > To: license-discuss@opensource.org > Subject: Re: [License-discuss] [Non-DoD Source] Re: NOSA 2.0, Copyfraud and > the US Government > > CC has to submit CC0 according to tradition/rules. For them to bother, since > they won't amend CC0 itself, probably there needs to be > some assurance it will at least get a vote at the next board meeting, if not > assurance it would pass. > > Neither seems likely. > > Easier to just to shrug their shoulders and ignore the whole OSI approval > thing.
Well, that's a pain. In that case, unless NOSA 2.0 gets approved, I suspect that at least some Government code is going to be zombie code, partly Open Source and partly CC0. Thanks, Cem Karan
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ License-discuss mailing list License-discuss@opensource.org https://lists.opensource.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/license-discuss
