license-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs Allison Randal
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs Engel Nyst
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs jonathon
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs Engel Nyst
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs jonathon
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry on CLAs John A. Lewis - Pointful
• [License-discuss] BSD license, source distributions and interpretations of "retain" Michael Bradley
  • Re: [License-discuss] BSD license, source distributions and interpretations of "retain" Francois Marier
  • Re: [License-discuss] BSD license, source distributions and interpretations of "retain" David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] BSD license, source distributions and interpretations of "retain" Gervase Markham
• [License-discuss] Public domain license - Public Domain Customized Joe Kua
  • Re: [License-discuss] Public domain license - Public Domain Customized Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] Public domain license - Public Domain Customized David Woolley
• Re: [License-discuss] Wikipedia Content Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Wikipedia Content John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Wikipedia Content Lawrence Rosen
• Re: [License-discuss] Another CACF patent case Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] Why CAVO Recommends GPLv3 Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why CAVO Recommends GPLv3 Tzeng, Nigel H.
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why CAVO Recommends GPLv3 Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why CAVO Recommends GPLv3 Tzeng, Nigel H.
  • Re: [License-discuss] Why CAVO Recommends GPLv3 Gervase Markham
• [License-discuss] Conservancy & FSF announce copyleft.org Bradley M. Kuhn
• [License-discuss] new moderators to help deal with spam? Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] Fwd: [Osi] License review Patrick Masson
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Submission by Mistake Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Submission by Mistake David Woolley
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] POS softwre Patrick Masson
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] OS license for seeds (!) Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] OS license for seeds (!) Lawrence Rosen
• [License-discuss] Fwd: [Osi] [General enquiries] Open source licence for a medical application Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: [Osi] [General enquiries] Open source licence for a medical application Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
• Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question Brian Hasson
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question Cinly Ooi
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question Lloyd
• [License-discuss] FW: [Trademark enquiries] MIT License attribution question Brian Hasson
• [License-discuss] Fwd: submission type: Approval license name: MIT for ExploreJaipur Project Tarun Dixit
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: submission type: Approval license name: MIT for ExploreJaipur Project David Woolley
• [License-discuss] Fwd: [Osi] [General enquiries] Type of License and Keylock Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] Fwd: [Osi] [General enquiries] Type of License and Keylock Ben Tilly
• [License-discuss] Better MIT License ? Joe Kua
  • Re: [License-discuss] Better MIT License ? Engel Nyst
• [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? ldr ldr
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? ChanMaxthon
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? Patrice-Emmanuel Schmitz
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? Kuno Woudt
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? David Woolley
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] You need to pay to access AGPL3 scripts? jonathon
• [License-discuss] How licenses treat patents Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] How licenses treat patents John Cowan
• [License-discuss] Creative Commons license compatibility draft published Kat Walsh
• [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Kuno Woudt
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Rick Moen
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Henrik Ingo
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Can OSI take stance that U.S. public domain is open source? Henrik Ingo
• [License-discuss] Open source attribution William Cheung
• Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Miles Fidelman
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Miles Fidelman
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Ben Cotton
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Bruno F. Souza
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Philip Odence
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Philip Odence
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Lawrence Rosen
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Philip Odence
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Nuno Brito
• [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? lro...@rosenlaw.com
  • Re: [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Simon Phipps
  • [License-discuss] FAQ entry (and potential website page?) on "why standard licenses"? Leon Rozenblit
• [License-discuss] UNSUBSCRIBE Thomas Schneider
  • Re: [License-discuss] UNSUBSCRIBE Nirk Niggler
  • [License-discuss] Unsubscribe Michael
• [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Buck Golemon
  • Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Buck Golemon
  • Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Buck Golemon
  • Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] A simple, no-requirements license. Buck Golemon
• [License-discuss] Including License specifics Parth Shah
  • Re: [License-discuss] Including License specifics John Cowan
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Contact to a german site Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Contact to a german site Richard Fontana
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Wilson, Andrew
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Kuno Woudt
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Wilson, Andrew
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Wilson, Andrew
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Wilson, Andrew
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] Dual License for CC0 Romain Berrendonner
• [License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ? awr
  • Re: [License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Zimbra licenses ? Richard Fontana
• [License-discuss] Screenshots of Open Source SW Sebastian Hoffmann
  • Re: [License-discuss] Screenshots of Open Source SW Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] Screenshots of Open Source SW Kuno Woudt
  • Re: [License-discuss] Screenshots of Open Source SW Sebastian Hoffmann
• [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Albert Vilella
  • Re: [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Ben Tilly
  • Re: [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Cinly Ooi
  • Re: [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Simon Phipps
  • [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Albert Vilella
  • Re: [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Gervase Markham
  • Re: [License-discuss] Illumina Open Source License Tamsen Dunn
• [License-discuss] license approval Vinod Kumar
  • Re: [License-discuss] license approval Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] For Approval: Public Software License Nikolaos-Modestos Kougioulis
• [License-discuss] FSF CLE seminar on GPL Enforcement and Legal Ethics Joshua Gay
• Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? opensource
• Re: [License-discuss] [Webmaster] [Web Site] Suggestion for web site improvement Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] compliance resources Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] compliance resources Reincke, Karsten
  • Re: [License-discuss] compliance resources Luis Villa
• Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? J Lovejoy
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Philip Odence
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Philip Odence
• [License-discuss] Is CC BY appropriate for software? xxlray
  • Re: [License-discuss] Is CC BY appropriate for software? Nuno Brito
  • Re: [License-discuss] Is CC BY appropriate for software? xxlray
  • Re: [License-discuss] Is CC BY appropriate for software? John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Is CC BY appropriate for software? Gervase Markham
• [License-discuss] OSI and the SPDX license list Philip Odence
  • [License-discuss] OSI and the SPDX license list Philip Odence
• [License-discuss] AUTO: OOO - Gabriela Lucini (returning 03/02/2014) Gabriela Lucini
• Re: [License-discuss] [Osi] [General enquiries] How to get approve a license Patrick Masson
• [License-discuss] New stable OSCAd server Reincke, Karsten
  • Re: [License-discuss] New stable OSCAd server Luis Villa
• [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack in (MIT licensed) (jquery) java-script packages? Reincke, Karsten
  • Re: [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack in (MIT licensed) (jquery) java-script packages? Richard Fontana
  • Re: [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack in (MIT licensed) (jquery) java-script packages? John Sullivan
  • Re: [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack in (MIT licensed) (jquery) java-script packages? Reincke, Karsten
  • Re: [License-discuss] Pars pro toto: a fundamental(?) lack in (MIT licensed) (jquery) java-script packages? Zak Rogoff
• [License-discuss] changing wiki.os.o to xwiki Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] changing wiki.os.o to xwiki Reincke, Karsten
  • Re: [License-discuss] changing wiki.os.o to xwiki Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] changing wiki.os.o to xwiki Patrick Masson
• [License-discuss] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Joe Murray
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Simon Phipps
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Joe Murray
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Joe Murray
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Karl Fogel
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Nuno Brito
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Patrick Masson
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Luis Villa
  • Re: [License-discuss] [Infrastructure] Machine readable source of OSI approved licenses? Karl Fogel
• [License-discuss] Obtaining Open Source licence Tonima Ali
  • Re: [License-discuss] Obtaining Open Source licence Miles Fidelman
  • Re: [License-discuss] Obtaining Open Source licence David Woolley
• [License-discuss] dual licensing and the Open Source Definition zgilboa
  • Re: [License-discuss] dual licensing and the Open Source Definition John Cowan
  • Re: [License-discuss] dual licensing and the Open Source Definition John Sullivan

• Earlier messages
• Later messages