On 12/19/06, Erik Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 15 December 2006 22:09, Anders Olofsson wrote: > 1.) This is a normal tree structure inspired mostly by kde's control > center. Icons are not required but they help make the dialog more > colourful. > I like this one the most as it gives a good overview of all available > pages and requires less clicking to get to an option compared with the > other two styles. > On the downside, this can look a bit messy. I agree with you and Eugene that #1 is the best of the three. As long as it isn't made into kcontrol, with too many options, requiring several minutes of searching just to find the option you was looking for.
I too agree that this one is the best. And as you said about searching where to find the option, I think we need to create some better and more intuitive classifications.
As for icons, I'd say that they are required. Otherwise it will just look ugly.
Yes, but then should we make them skinable? I'm in favor of not making them skinable.
With that said, I'm all for #1. If you decide to do the work (as I hope you will), please use the Qt4 branch.
Also, we should have a discussion about proper names and classifications. Jon -- ________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ: 16325723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.licq.org GPG: 2290A71F http://www.thejon.org HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan
