On Friday 22 June 2007 07:57, Sebastian Renzi wrote: > Some time ago, the protocol version reported by licq was v9, but > lately I've seen licq report v8 again. Is there a reason for that?
I changed it to v9 to properly imitate the version tht used xtraz statuses. But it wasn't complete so I backed it down just to be safe. Doing a simple version increment could make the server expect different versions of the protocol, so it needs some more testing just to be safe. > What ever happened to that? Was it discarded or it was just delayed? Delayed. Need to fix some bugs first. > Is there any way I can help to implement that? In my opinion knowing > the "real" status is a major feature and should be given high > priority. Yes, it is important. If you want to help out with it you will first have to get some packet dumps to see how it works. That is always the first part. I had some work done, but it wasn't complete yet so I'm not sure how much that would help you. Jon -- ________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ: 16325723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.licq.org GPG: 2290A71F http://www.thejon.org HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan
