After looking at the patch, I have to say that yes, that is very simple. Which brings to question, do you need the granularity of each type of change? Or would just one signal LIST_GROUP_UPDATE would be sufficient? In the patch, you treat all types of changes as the same, so it seems that fine granularity is not needed.
> I have made a patch for signalling from the daemon to plugins when groups > are being added, removed, renamed, or reordered. Since there is no good > group identification (as it was discussed with Anders in irc), plugins are > only able to tell what happened with groups but cannot tell which exact > group(s) the action was performed upon. This has to be discussed further. > Therefore, the daemon patch in attachment is pretty simple. I missed this conversation on IRC. What exactly is needed? Jon -- ________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ: 16325723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] MSN: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.licq.org GPG: 2290A71F http://www.thejon.org HOME: Minamiashigara, Japan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
