On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 12:56, Anders Olofsson <fl...@licq.org> wrote: > ##### Group 1 - Fixed tickets ##### > Unless anyone can prove these aren't fixed, I consider them closed.
Nothing to add here. > ##### Group 2 - Definitely bugs ##### > I know these are existing problems (or at least was last time I updated > these tickets). Looks ok to me. > ##### Group 3 - Possibly bugs ##### In general, I think we should only migrate bug reports with clear and understandable descriptions. If we can't understand the report or reproduce the problem it will probably never get fixed. In this case I think less is more. If we miss to migrate a bug report for a real bug, someone else will discover it and report it in which case we'll get a report from someone that hopefully is interested in helping us solve it. > 384 [icq] GUI popup sometimes show idle time larger than logged in time > => Haven't seen this in a while so not sure if it's still a bug Seems minor and if you haven't seen it maybe we can leave it. > 556 [daemon] Group handing is strange due to merging of local and server > lists > => We don't know if a mismatch is due to local or server change, also > there are different opinions Perhaps skip this until someone new reports it as an issue? > 559 [icq] Licq shows IP when ip hiding is enabled > => Workaround in ticket that I'm guessing is a hack I vaguely remember something about IP hiding being removed from the ICQ protocol? If so we should skip this as well. > 597b [gui] Top chat pane is not updated when encoding is changed > => Not sure if this shold be considered a bug or working as intended When uncertain leave it out. > 675 [daemon] Licq adds all receivers to the list Don't know what this is, but it sounds like it could be a bug. > 741 [icq] Checking if a user is invisible doesn't work >From the title is sounds like something that once worked but that have since been fixed in the ICQ protocol (on the server side). > 1461 [icq] Sending URL to multiple contacts is only sent to one recipient Similar to 844? > 1722 [jabber] Typing notification received when sending to offline contact I wrote this one right? If so, skip it. I think I concluded that it was something strange with the server. > ##### Group 4 - Realistic enhancements ##### > I consider these enhancements doable without major changes > 1363 [daemon] Create the plugin pipeline architecture > => Not sure what this means. Task created by Erik This was when Licq 2.0 was the next big thing. Can be skipped now. > ##### Group 5 - Low-prio enhancements ##### > Enhancements that will require more work but might still be possible to do Seems reasonable. > ##### Group 6 - Other ##### > These are tickets I want to just forget when migrating, let me know if you > think otherwise I agree with you. // Erik -- Erik Johansson Home Page: http://ejohansson.se/ PGP Key: http://ejohansson.se/erik.asc
