Hello Erik,
On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 13:09:23 +0200 Erik Johansson <e...@ejohansson.se> wrote: > Hi, > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Anders Olofsson <fl...@licq.org> wrote: > > So I though, maybe it would be possible to use an existing library for MSN > > support, just like we use gloox for Jabber. > > I'm all for using a library to implement the basic protocol stuff. It > makes it possible for us to focus our limited resources on more > important issues. That's a very good idea. I quit using Licq because of its buggy and incomplete MSN support years ago (had no choice, a corporate and social move made all my contacts leaving ICQ to MSN :-( ). I would like to use Licq again! Exactly how some stuff moved to gmail groups.. here again I won't say all the bad things I think of this move ;-). > > I've had a quick look at libmsn (used by Kopete) and think it might be a > > candidate. > > If we replace it, does anyone know if libmsn is > > good/usable/maintained or if there is something better out there? > > If Kopete uses it (and aren't in the middle of switching to something > else) I think it sounds like a good option. Just to be sure it might > be worthwhile to do a quick google search just to see that you aren't > missing some obvious candidate. Otherwise, go for libmsn. Would it be an option to use libpurple or is it irrelevant (way too big and not focused on MSN)? Regards, -- wwp --
