On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Anton Jansen wrote: |bugtracker, instead of making them invalid you simply ignore them. For |example bug #460164, I reported it 5 months from now and the problem is |still there.
If it's a bug with the 1.0.x series it is no longer being maintained and will most probably never be fixed. |What is your policy regarding bug fixing, i wonder? For example do you |want to fix all bugs with a certain priority before the next release? Is |there a main developer that has one big job, fixing all those irritating |little bugs? Right now the top priority is to make licq work with mirabilis new v8 protocol.. and the developers are focusing mainly on that( licq 1.1)... so the little bugs are definitely way down the order of priority ... as compared to the BIG ones that are affecting users of the 1.0.x versions .. lost messages .. repeating messages etc. Once the current devel tree gets stabilized .. I guess they'll start work on fixing the little bugs if they still exist ! Until then... you'll have to wait. Kingsly _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
