On Thursday 06 June 2002 01:12, Jacob Bunk Nielsen wrote: > Phillip Pi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The CVS I downloaded a few days ago is really stable on my two Linux > > machines (Red Hat v7.1 and v7.2). At least it should be released as 1.05 > > Beta or something. > > I use it on Red Hat 7.2, and have a crash or two once in a while. I > guess that's (also) why a new version hasn't been released yet. > > It should be called 1.1.0-pre1 or something like that, if you ask > me. But have a look at the devel-mailinglist. Then you'll see that > there are a lot of things going on beneath the surface at the moment. > > > An update on the Web site frontpage is a good idea IMHO. > > I agree. Unfortunately I don't have the time to do much about at the > moment (exams and stuff).
If you have no time for web site updates i could do this for you, would be no problem. I agree to the others, there should be at least a notice on the website explaining what is going on right now with 1.0.4 and 1.1.0 CVS version. This way the user can decide what he wants. Some people may happen to only communicate with other licq-clients, for these 1.0.4 would be great and enough. for others (communicating with win-clients) CVS version is the better solution (in my opinion). so if the people from licq-devel list agree, i will try to prepare an updated website-frontpage and dennis could implement it to licq.org. so people from licq-devel, what do you think about this matter? any suggestions? your opinions about this? greats, thomas _______________________________________________________________ Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference August 25-28 in Las Vegas -- http://devcon.sprintpcs.com/adp/index.cfm _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
