-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 19 December 2002 01:06, Dirk Mueller wrote: > On Mit, 18 Dez 2002, Juan F. Codagnone wrote: > > Also, it checks the type of the getsockopt's optlen > > isn't that equivalent to moving the socklen_t check in front of the > socks5 test?
the socklen_t check only checks whether the socklen_t type exists. The real problem here is the type of the getsockopt arguments. socklen_t can be defined, but if socks is enabled, the socks library can use an int as formal argument. - -- Buenos Aires, Argentina -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+AniHUMlRieHkprgRAkGtAJ4y5d0p7Wcll0rcmfiy0YwHkMS1AgCeMeUV 4OJRaaCDnCHIUfh6iIYtRIo= =eTmC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: Geek Gift Procrastinating? Get the perfect geek gift now! Before the Holidays pass you by. T H I N K G E E K . C O M http://www.thinkgeek.com/sf/ _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
