-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 25 January 2003 06:50 pm, Ian Collier wrote: > Well I don't understand C++ but I'm not sure why the other compilers > don't complain (but gcc 2.95.2 didn't and I think that's probably a > later version than egcs 1.0.3a).
Perhaps egcs1.0.3a isn't following the C++ specification exactly. I took a closer look at the problem, and it should compile fine I believe with any standard C++ compiler. I'm going to revert my change since that breaks conformity with the C++ standard. Jon ______________________________________________________________ Jon Keating ICQ #16325723 [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG ID: 0x2290A71F emostar on irc.openprojects.net -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+NAWsld1KayKQpx8RAgGEAJ91TXY1lMUdS7mQCDr21bD8jLEgYwCcCjq7 t8WhNsywOC8kPyhJWLFj59I= =9Ven -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See! http://www.vasoftware.com _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
