-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Wednesday 12 February 2003 10:56, you wrote:
> --- "Juan F. Codagnone" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> > yes. i also miss the behaviour. probably it got
> > changed with Dima's fix.
>
> I don't understand what you mean, when I hit cancel
> while the message is sending it aborts the sending and
> I can select the send through server checkbox to have
> it sent through server and hit send again. Why do you
> want it to prompt you if it should send through server
> after you had cancelled, that is counter intuitive
> since this requires you to "cancel" a message twice
> for it to actually be cancelled.

i dont know if it was the intended behaviour, but i got used  to it. in a way 
it was smart: the only reason for me to hit cancel is to force the message to 
go throught server. I just typed  ESC and  ENTER. but i can be accustomed to 
other behaviour.

- -- 
Buenos Aires, Argentina

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE+Sla4UMlRieHkprgRAlPhAKDk4vjx+k2BbCQqlre8Rd5mcWPMUQCdEtJ1
MBgm2Mz0zDZkd3KStKmwj00=
=PaXm
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
http://www.vasoftware.com
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel

Reply via email to