-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Sunday 16 February 2003 06:17, Thomas Reitelbach wrote: > I'm not sure about it, but i think we have no need to handle rtf messages > if we only want to support simlies. Internally the messages are handled > html-like anyway, so we could parse the message and insert smilies where > required. > am i wrong at this point?
not at all, if we are talking about replacing ascii emotincons with graphics ones. I thought that we were talking about handling these messages: {\rtf1\ansi\deff0 {\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss MS Sans Serif;}{\f1\fswiss helvetica;}} {\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;} \viewkind4\pard\cf1\f0 \f1\highlight0\pard<##icqimage0000>hello<##icqimage000F>\par } that would be the message: :-)hello:-D - -- Buenos Aires, Argentina -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQE+T5k2UMlRieHkprgRAuVaAKCHetD+8q4xAwnrDTExhQadySoP0gCeK+rw X7P/0IOztqxWMupI9Fiido4= =0Bl7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel