-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 16 February 2003 06:17, Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
> I'm not sure about it, but i think we have no need to handle rtf messages
> if we only want to support simlies. Internally the messages are handled
> html-like anyway, so we could parse the message and insert smilies where
> required.
> am i wrong at this point?

not at all, if we are talking about replacing ascii emotincons with graphics
ones. I thought that we were talking about handling these messages:

{\rtf1\ansi\deff0
{\fonttbl{\f0\fswiss MS Sans Serif;}{\f1\fswiss helvetica;}}
{\colortbl ;\red0\green0\blue0;}
\viewkind4\pard\cf1\f0
\f1\highlight0\pard<##icqimage0000>hello<##icqimage000F>\par
}

that would be the message:
      :-)hello:-D


- --
Buenos Aires, Argentina
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQE+T5k2UMlRieHkprgRAuVaAKCHetD+8q4xAwnrDTExhQadySoP0gCeK+rw
X7P/0IOztqxWMupI9Fiido4=
=0Bl7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel

Reply via email to