Thomas Reitelbach wrote:
On Monday 26 May 2003 22:43, Martin Kotzan wrote:

On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 08:02:05PM -0400, Jon Keating wrote:

1) I'd like the 1000ms clearDelay for marking messages read to be shorter
(100ms?).

Yes, after using this for some days now it seems a bit long for me, too. I believe a value between 100-250ms would be satisfying.


I agree, now one second feels like an eternity sometimes. I think this 100-250ms would be good, I tested 200ms delay few times and it felt quite comfortable.

--
# Tuomas Jaakola



-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: ObjectStore.
If flattening out C++ or Java code to make your application fit in a
relational database is painful, don't do it! Check out ObjectStore.
Now part of Progress Software. http://www.objectstore.net/sourceforge
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel

Reply via email to