> I'd suggest to use "NULL" instead of "0" because it is less > confusing. I don't know any system where NULL != 0 so it should not > make any difference > (in a technical view).
I have always preferred using 0, NULL is a C relic. Some compilers even support nil, yuck! Jon ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay Get office equipment for less on eBay! http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5 _______________________________________________ Licq-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
