In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Jon Keating <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> info to you) packet. For me to fix this, I need an ethereal dump of
> when this happens. I have only seen it once, then I modified the code
> and it hasn't happened to me anymore.. but guess it isn't fixed.
The dump I sent to the list is not right? Take a look at this
message:
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
http://ubr.inf.br
Linux 2.6.12
SĂ£o Paulo - SP
-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA
Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf
_______________________________________________
Licq-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-devel
