On Wed, Feb 13, 2002 at 01:59:52PM -0600, "Jamin W. Collins"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:42:23 +0100
> "<DeXteR>" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> just out of curiosity, the CVS tree seems to be stable the last few
>>> weeks, is licq 1.1.0 about to be released as stable version?
> (snip)
>>> PS, I say go for it, I'm running the cvs version and I don't have
>>> any problems, I can send through server, authorize, search, etc. no
>>> crashes either.
>>>
>> Yap, but update your info isn't not implemented, send file either not.
>> And not to forget SMS support.......... :)
>
> I think these could be pushed off for a while, maybe added an update
> release to follow. GnomeICU doesn't have support for these yet, either.
> The big thing would be to get a functional release out that provides
> support for most the new protocol. This would be highly benificial for
> those that don't normally run the CVS version.
Why? I think releasing licq in its current state would only confuse
people not on this list. At least if they get it from CVS they'll know
they're running a devel version. If they're running an official release
they'll start to expect things like all features working and all that.
--
Tim van Erven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
_______________________________________________
Licq-main mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/licq-main
