Is there an interest in Lift using valid XHTML, or do the Lift crew only care if it's well-formed? I ask because the current version of Lift creates XHTML that is invalid on every page unless you adjust the default settings, and even then there seems to be a lot of framework-generated HTML that violates the XHTML DTD.
I prefer valid XHTML, so I adjust settings and rewrite pieces of Lift that break the code, but it occurs to me that others might not even be aware that this is an issue and might like to know how to make the HTML valid. So is this something others are interested in, or is it enough that the current HTML output appears to work in most browsers? If the former, I'd be happy to contribute examples for how to fix the problems. (For the record, this is a serious question. Most of the programmers I know really couldn't care less if their HTML is "valid" as long as it works, so I don't want to assume anything. Even most programming books that show HTML show really bad, invalid, and obsolete HTML. HTML is evidently not considered a real language by most programmers.) Chas. Oh, and for those who are curious and haven't tried it, the W3C HTML Validator is here: http://validator.w3.org/ There's a CSS validator, too: http://jigsaw.w3.org/css-validator/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
