Right ... I think MetaRecord.asHtml should be renamed to toXHtml. This needs to call Field.toXHtml for each field.
Now when we render a record to a field 2 templates can be used: 1. A default div based template that would suffice for simple forms 2. A user provided template we should probably apply the same thing for display (toXHtml) thoughts? Br's, Marius On Nov 24, 2:20 am, "Derek Chen-Becker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm writing up the chapter on Record right now (nothing like a moving > target!) and I just wanted to confirm that the MetaRecord.asHtml is really > intended to default to NodeSeq.Empty. Since there's a default "template" for > form generation it seemed a little strange that there isn't a default for > display. It's also a little confusing, since Field has a toXHtml method on > it that defaults to a Text node and seems like it would be a perfect > default. > > Thanks, > > Derek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
