On Wed, Nov 26, 2008 at 10:28 AM, Marius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I believe so. Record/Field currently provide necessary abstraction and > server side validation structure. JDBC implementation for Record stuff > it's on its way ... and of course one could write a DB4O > implementation for it. > > I think it would be sweet to have such integration in the future but I > don't think it would be part of lift core (... but I've been wrong > before :) ...).
We will not be providing support for DB4O or BDB in the core Lift packages because of licensing issues. I'd be very interested in someone else providing external support for both. > > > Br's, > Marius > > On Nov 26, 3:48 am, "Erick Fleming" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm real interested in using Lift with OODBs (currently using DB4O and > > looking and Berkeley). > > > > Is the new Record/Field stuff (I'm ignorant about Rails) concussive for > this > > type of data access or if it more for relational structures? > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
