I would but I have so many other things going on right now I don't want to hold things up. I don't want to sound like I'm complaining about something and not wanting to actually deal with it but my plate is pretty full :(
Derek On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 3:21 PM, David Pollak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 1:44 PM, Derek Chen-Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi, >> I'm writing the chapter on Mapper/Record right now and I was wondering >> why there have been small name changes between the two frameworks. Things >> like >> >> 1. MappedField.validations vs. Field.validators >> 2. MappedField.asHtml vs. Field.asXHtml (and Field.toXHtml, which >> seems redundant) >> >> If these are still in flux I'll just leave it alone and make a task for >> myself to check back later, but in general I'd say sticking with the Mapper >> method names would help the transition unless there's a strong desire to >> rename things. > > > Some of the Mapper names suck. Renaming them would be good. > > Do you want to own the task of choosing the method names that suck and > proposing changes and marking the names that don't suck as "don't change"? > > >> >> >> Derek >> >> >> > > > -- > Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net > Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us > Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp > Git some: http://github.com/dpp > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
