Apache ESME source is now fixed & building cleanly again - thanks to
David for this.
Cheers,
Darren
On Dec 18, 10:48 pm, Darren Hague <dha...@fortybeans.com> wrote:
> David,
>
> "error: value template is not a member of object
> net.liftweb.http.LiftRules"
>
> I removed net/liftweb from my Maven repo about an hour ago, so I'm
> pretty sure I'm up to date with the latest build.
>
> Cheers,
> Darren
>
> On Dec 18, 10:42 pm, "David Pollak" <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Darren,
>
> > Any LiftRules.append* or LiftRules.prepend* becomes LiftRules.*.append or
> > LiftRules.*.prepend
>
> > e.g.: LiftRules.prependTemplate(User.templates) ->
> > LiftRules.template.prepend(User.templates)
>
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 2:39 PM, Darren Hague <dha...@fortybeans.com> wrote:
>
> > > A bit better, thanks - that fixed the *Dispatch calls. Now it's just
> > > the following lines causing a problem:
>
> > > LiftRules.prependTemplate(User.templates)
>
> > > LiftRules.appendStatelessDispatch {
> > > case r @ Req("api" :: "send_msg" :: Nil, "", PostRequest)
> > > if r.param("token").isDefined =>
> > > () => RestAPI.sendMsgWithToken(r)
> > > }
>
> > > LiftRules.prependRewrite {
> > > case RewriteRequest(ParsePath("user" :: user :: Nil,"", _,_), _,
> > > _) =>
> > > RewriteResponse( List("user_view", "index"), Map("uid" ->
> > > user))
> > > case RewriteRequest(ParsePath("tag" :: tag :: Nil,"", _,_), _,
> > > _) =>
> > > RewriteResponse( List("user_view", "tag"), Map("tag" -> tag))
>
> > > case RewriteRequest(ParsePath("conversation" :: cid :: Nil, "",
> > > _, _),
> > > _, _) =>
> > > RewriteResponse(List("user_view", "conversation"), Map("cid" -
> > > > cid))
>
> > > case RewriteRequest(ParsePath("search" :: term :: Nil,"", _,_),
> > > _, _) =>
> > > RewriteResponse( List("user_view", "search"), Map("term" ->
> > > term))
> > > }
>
> > > LiftRules.appendViewDispatch {
> > > case "user_view" :: _ => UserView
> > > }
>
> > > LiftRules.appendEarly(makeUtf8)
>
> > > Cheers,
> > > Darren
>
> > > On Dec 18, 9:52 pm, TylerWeir <tyler.w...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Hey Darren,
>
> > > > Something like this:
>
> > > > // Old and busted
> > > > LiftRules.prependDispatch(RestAPI.dispatch)
>
> > > > // New hotness
> > > > LiftRules.dispatch.prepend(RestAPI.dispatch)
>
> > > > Lather, rinse and repeat for dispatch, rewrite, etc
>
> > > > Better, or worse?
>
> > > > Ty
>
> > > > On Dec 18, 4:47 pm, Darren Hague <dha...@fortybeans.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dano (or David),
>
> > > > > Care to share what your changes were? I'm facing the same problem
> > > > > right now with ESME - lots of LiftRules.append* and LiftRules.prepend*
> > > > > in Boot.scala which will not compile any more - even Googling
> > > > > "LiftRules RulesSeq" returns no results at all... :-(
>
> > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > Darren
>
> > > > > On Dec 15, 7:08 pm, Dano <dan_ole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Marius,
>
> > > > > > David was able to help me out. In the future, I will have to dig
> > > > > > myself out of the situation. For those Lift developers that are not
> > > > > > 'committers' it is harder to know how to proceed. Perhaps in the
> > > > > > future, the breaking changes should include a little more detail on
> > > > > > which signatures have been changed and how they can be transformed.
>
> > > > > > In any case, I am happy there is this group to ask for help!
>
> > > > > > Thanks.
>
> > > > > > Dan
>
> > > > > > On Dec 15, 12:08 am, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Sorry Dan ... There were too many changes in LiftRules. You
> > > > > > > should
> > > be
> > > > > > > able to determine real quick what changed in LiftRules since the
> > > > > > > variables naming is more or less the same.
>
> > > > > > > If you can not fix your code can you please copy-paste it here ?
> > > ...
> > > > > > > in this way I may be able to help.
>
> > > > > > > Br's,
> > > > > > > Marius
>
> > > > > > > On Dec 15, 1:55 am, Dano <dan_ole...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Marius,
>
> > > > > > > > Is there someway you can communicate what the 'from' and 'to'
> > > changes
> > > > > > > > are so that I can have a chance at being able to fix my now
> > > broken
> > > > > > > > code?
>
> > > > > > > > Dan
>
> > > > > > > > On Dec 13, 12:31 pm, Marius <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > All,
>
> > > > > > > > > I committed a bunch of changes inLiftRules. In a previous
> > > thread
> > > > > > > > > Jorge suggested the abstraction ofLiftRulesvariables. Lists of
> > > > > > > > > functions are now abstracted by RulesSeq trait, which contains
> > > prepend
> > > > > > > > > and append functions. Note that if you're calling
> > > prepend/append
> > > > > > > > > functions after boot they will throw an exception. If there
> > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > compelling reasons not to do this please let us know. This is
> > > just a
> > > > > > > > > mechanism to enforce the use of these functions on startup.
>
> > > > > > > > > Br's,
> > > > > > > > > Marius
>
> > --
> > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net
> > Collaborative Task Managementhttp://much4.us
> > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp
> > Git some:http://github.com/dpp
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
