On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 7:13 AM, TylerWeir <[email protected]> wrote: > > Once people get Can, I think it makes sense, so I think we can leave > it. > > As a replacement, I can't think of a good real-life example of a thing > with a failure indicator that fits the bill. :) > > What about OptionWithFailure, OptionWF, OptWithF? > It's more typing, but it's accurate. > > FailureIndicatingOption? FIOption? >
These are pretty much my thoughts on the issue also. I like OptionWithFailure the best, but of the suggestions for very short names, Can is a reasonable choice once you see an explanation. Matt --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
