Thanks David. This clarified the main issues I was curious about.

On Dec 27, 5:19 pm, "David Pollak" <[email protected]>
wrote:
> To the extent that Lift and HAppS both take advantage of their respective
> underlying languages, yes.
>
> At the practical level, they bear very little resembelence to each other.
> Lift sits on top of an ActiveRecord style ORM where HAppS has a monad-based
> mechanism for mapping in and out of persistent store.  HAppS has no
> templating (other than a jvm powered xslt translation layer), no ajax or
> comet support, etc.
>
> I think HAppS is a thing of beauty, but I haven't found ways of bringing
> HAppS goodness into Lift.
>
> On Dec 26, 2008 7:20 PM, "Stefan Scott" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is lift very similar to HAppS?

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to