Ah here it is: http://www.wlmark.com/xhtml-html.php
about half way down is a dicussion about <br />, browsers, xml vs sgml and such matters. BR, John On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 6:50 PM, John Nilsson <[email protected]> wrote: > As it should. I don't think even the XML standard say that <tag></tag> is > equvalent to <tag/>. I've had problems withd DTDs or Schemas that only > allowed one form for some definitions. > Now if you mean IE6 then XML isn't on the topic either way as it only > supports HTML. IIRC the HTML standard (before version 4) standardized <tag/> > to mean new line no matter what and <br> is of course a stand alone new line > even in HTML 4. Maybe </br> shouldn't be treated as a new line. I guess if > the browser is in tag soup mode it is the sane thing to do. > > BR, > John > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:27 PM, David Pollak < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> Folks, >> >> IE barfs on <br></br> (it treats them as 2 BR tags). What other tags are >> in this category in IE? >> >> Thanks, >> >> David >> >> -- >> Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net >> Collaborative Task Management http://much4.us >> Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp >> Git some: http://github.com/dpp >> >> >> >> > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
