Greg,
I haven't had a chance to look at your code, but are you testing in Firefox?

Firefox has a very, very, very nasty bug related to XHTML namepsaces that's
further poked by jQuery.

Marius is working on a fix and it should be out tomorrow.

Please try Safari or Chrome for testing and see if the problems are the
same.

Thanks,

David

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Meredith Gregory
<[email protected]>wrote:

> Lifted,
>
> The test case i submitted for strange behavior also happens to be a
> regression test for 11-SNAPSHOT. If you compile and run the dspace test case
> under lift .10, at least the activity creation code works as expected. If
> you compile and run the dspace test case under lift 11-SNAPSHOT, the
> activity creation code does nothing at all.
>
> i'd roll back to 10, but for the fact that i need changes related to JPA. i
> can haz a clue?
>
> Best wishes,
>
> --greg
>
> On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Meredith Gregory <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Lifted,
>>
>> Attached is a minimal example of a strange interaction between lift and a
>> jQuery plugin. If you unzip the example you will find inside the
>> liftTestCase directory 5 subdirectories two of which contain behaviors to
>> compare. The directory 23 contains an example that is purely jQuery with the
>> EasyWidgets plugin. The directory dspace contains a lift-based site.
>>
>> If you open 23/index.html in a browser you will see a page that allows you
>> to add widgets that can be dragged and dropped around. This all works. If
>> you cd into dspace and launch mvn jetty:run, sign up, login, then you will
>> see a boiled down version of the same thing. The difference is that the
>> javascript jQuery call is run as a JsRaw. Everything seems to work except
>> you attempt to drag and drop the components. Then you get very weird
>> behavior that is easier to see than to describe.
>>
>> The thing is, we haven't actually done any interesting lift stuff, yet, in
>> the boiled down sample. We're just calling into the EasyWidgets function
>> just like in the sample. i would expect these two examples to exhibit nearly
>> identical behavior. i'm guessing there's some weird interaction between
>> lift-included javascript and the jQuery plugin.
>>
>> Several questions:
>>
>>    - How could we devise a way to check at compile time that there is
>>    such an interaction? This seems to be a crucial point as the momentum is 
>> to
>>    use third party frontend web components.
>>    - What is the best way to go about finding the interaction if it has
>>    escaped compile time detection?
>>
>>
>> Best wishes,
>>
>> --greg
>>
>> --
>> L.G. Meredith
>> Managing Partner
>> Biosimilarity LLC
>> 806 55th St NE
>> Seattle, WA 98105
>>
>> +1 206.650.3740
>>
>> http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com
>>
>
>
>
> --
> L.G. Meredith
> Managing Partner
> Biosimilarity LLC
> 806 55th St NE
> Seattle, WA 98105
>
> +1 206.650.3740
>
> http://biosimilarity.blogspot.com
>
> >
>


-- 
Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net
Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890
Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp
Git some: http://github.com/dpp

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to