Well yeah but I only havethis code from you:
def resourceBundles : List[ResourceBundle] =
...
case Nil => _resBundle.set(LiftRules.resourceNames.flatMap(name =>
tryo {
List(ResourceBundle.getBundle(name, locale))
} openOr {
// I think this is right...
LiftRules.resourceBundleFactories.toList.find(_.isDefinedAt
(locale)).map(_.apply(locale))
openOr Nil
}))
... and you are looking intothe factories if not found in the
"traditional" bundles. WHich I guess is fine ... but I don't see the
"name" from resurceNames passed to the factory.
SO the name has a meaning in the curent approach but not anymore when
using the new factories?
On Feb 27, 8:00 pm, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]> wrote:
> Don't they achieve different things? resourceNames just defines the base
> name for which the default java system starts looking for localizations
> right?
>
> Cheers, Tim
>
> On 27/02/2009 17:54, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > How would LiftRule.resourceNames work with
>
> > type ResourceBundleFactoryPF = PartialFunction[Locale,Box
> > [ResourceBundle]]
> > var resourceBundleFactories : RulesSeq[ResourceBundleFactory]
>
> > ... from usability perspective ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Lift" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
