On a related note, whilst we appreciate this is not ideal for new users (right now), we are trying to make it better as Jorge says. The flip side of this is that whilst its more difficult to consolidate API documentation with the maven modules, its a lot more modular which is actually better for the implementation with end users (take what you need, leave what you don't).
We are committed to improving the documentation and getting started material in and around lift, but its a mammoth task as you can imagine - if there is something you think missing, just crack onto the wiki and write an article. Power to the people :-) Cheers, Tim On Mar 4, 11:33 am, Jorge Ortiz <[email protected]> wrote: > The ScalaDocs are there. They're just hard to find. And they're split up by > module. > > For > example:http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/lift-util/scaladocs/index.htmlhttp://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/lift-webkit/scaladocs/index.htmlhttp://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/lift-mapper/scaladocs/index.html > etc > > Yes, this is sub-optimal. Yes, it's being worked on. > > Cheers, > > --j > > On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Paul Stickney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't mean to be incredibly picky, but the LiftWeb site is /NOT/ > > doing any justice to the LiftWeb framework. > > > At the very least I would expect working online JavaDoc. > > (http://scala-tools.org/mvnsites/liftweb/right now appears to be much > > nothing) > > > Even throwing an older/"less pretty" javadoc (I know I've seen this > > somewhere before) back up would be a better solution than this limbo > > that makes LiftWeb appear unloved :( --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
