I agree, and I would have gone for toList or toSeq or something however its a java.util.Set, so in order to get that functionality we'd need to to:
.toArray.toList Whilst I could live with this, it does feel somewhat dirty. Cheers, Tim On Mar 5, 7:57 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me except the toArray part... I prefer toList is that's > available > > On Mar 5, 2009 11:41 AM, "Tim Perrett" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Guys, > > I have a situation where I need to retrive all the keys in my > KeyedCache - however, KeyedCache extends LRU, which it turn uses > apache commons LRUMap internally. > > The LRU class has a private val map: LRUMap > > Is there any objections to me adding a method to LRU to return all the > keys from that map?: > > // off the top of my head... > def keys: Array[KeyType] = map.keySet().asInstanceOf[Set > [KeyType]].toArray > > Thoughts? > > Cheers, Tim --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
