On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 8:35 PM, Chad Skinner <[email protected]>wrote:
> I may be greatly overcomplicating things... I have been trying to read some > of the source code for the LiftServlet.scala and the class comment is: > I'm working with a couple of the OSGi gurus on this issue. They're in town for EclipseCon this week and I'll be meeting with them on Thursday. Don't worry about doing anything... we'll get OSGi support into Lift. And yes, this is a very old (circa Dec 2006) comment. > > /** > > * An implementation of HttpServlet. Just drop this puppy into > > * your Java web container, do a little magic in web.xml, and > > * ta-da, you've got a scala-powered Servlet > > * > */ > > Is there any more information about the "little magic in web.xml" part of > this? Does it imply that the filter is required or that by registering this > servlet the servlet itself is treated as a Lift Servlet? > > > I know from David's previous post that there is logic in the filter that > will need to be refactored / extracted into common classes so that the logic > can be utilized regardless of the request mechanism. ... So I am assuming > this Servlet still requires the Filter. > > I know I have a lot of reading to do (about both Lift and Scala), but > hopefully I'll have something figured out soon that I can come back to you > all with. > > > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
