Just taken a look over the code - looks pretty cool! I like your ideas for ConcurrentHashMap - all sounds pretty awesome... regarding the use of EHCache, I rekon as long as provide a hook mechinism into the cache system, then sure, we should let people worry about those issues in there specific implementation as 90% of users simply wont need that functionality IMO.
Cheers, Tim On Apr 5, 8:53 pm, Timothy Perrett <timo...@getintheloop.eu> wrote: > Wow, derek you must be watching Github like a hawk haha ;-) > > Just to bring an off list convo between myself and Marius onto the list, are > we looking at having some generic caching infrastructure in lift? This would > be great re the localization / translation stuff im working on which > currently uses KeyedCache in lift-util as a base. > > Im just doing a git pull for the cache branch... > > Cheers > > Tim > > On 05/04/2009 20:38, "marius d." <marius.dan...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Good :) ... I was also thinking on a flush-able caching mechanism. So > > far the InMemoryCache is more for exemplification as it is not yet > > thread safe. It is based on LRU cache but I'm also thinking to also > > combine the ConcurrentHashMap approach with LRU ... also I was > > thinking to a SoftReference map (as I implemented this once in Java) > > but we'll see. It's evolving. I'm not sure at all if we should use > > EHCahe or JBossCahe like solutions as we don't really need distributed > > caching. Basides if people will want this they can just plugin their > > own caching mechanisms. > > > Br's, > > Marius > > > On Apr 5, 10:24 pm, Derek Chen-Becker <dchenbec...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just saw the commit from Marius on a preliminary template cache and it > >> looks good. I was thinking the same thing in terms of where and how to hook > >> it. I think that there are some possibilities for some more functionality > >> on > >> the TemplateCache trait, including a programmatic flush (in case you're > >> pushing new template files in production and want to force re-fetching, for > >> instance), but I like the basic concept. > > >> Derek --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
