Taking the discussion to the main list On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 10:23 AM, Jonas Bonér <jo...@jonasboner.com> wrote:
> > 2009/4/16 David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 7:08 AM, Jonas Bonér <jo...@jonasboner.com> > wrote: > >> > >> 2009/4/16 David Pollak <feeder.of.the.be...@gmail.com>: > >> > It'd be optimal if you could discuss the JTA stuff in the public > forum. > >> > In > >> > terms of AOP, I'm really not kidding that AOP is not going to happen > in > >> > Lift. > >> > >> You don't like annotations? E.g. @Transactional etc.? > > > > I'm not keen on annotations, but I can live with them. > > > > I am firmly against anything that re-writes byte-code after the > compilation > > phase for production code. Once the Scala-Maven plugin supports compiler > > plugins, then there's a lot of stuff that can be done at compile-time. > > The AOP stuff I have done is based on dynamic proxies no bytecode munging. OKay... I need to see some example to fully understand why a proxy needs AOP rather than either (1) compile-time proxy generation or (2) the built-in Java reflect proxy thingy. > > > > > > So, what does AOP give us that can't be done at another phase? > > > > Semantics to annotations. Can you help out with an example? Thanks, David -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to liftweb@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to liftweb+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
