On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:33 PM, marius d. <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Good ... well then shouldn't the same rationale be applied for > <lift:with-param> since with-param is not really a snippet invocation? > > perhaps for lift tags that are not really snippets to use: > > <lift-tag:bind> > <lift-tag:with-param> Sure... the old tags should be deprecated and print out nasty messages on the console when used. > > > ? > > Br's, > Marius > > On Apr 27, 10:08 pm, David Pollak <[email protected]> > wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:25 AM, marius d. <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > I'm not referring to something similar to lift:bind. Just that using > > > snippets or Loc snippets, chooseTemplate etc. gives you the ability to > > > to change content depending on what page you are which is with-param > > > kind of does. > > > > > No worries, these are valid question and to me it kind of boils down > > > to the style of designing the lift template cause there is quite a bit > > > of flexibility provided so things can be done in many ways. > > > > > So I guess it needs to be determined what would replace <lift:bind> > > > (if it will be replaced). > > > > The only thing that's being changed is <lift:bind /> (which looks like a > > snippet invocation) to something like: <lift_bind:point name... /> > > > > It's a syntactic change that has no semantic difference. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Personally I really don't mind <lift:bind> ... :) > > > > > Br's, > > > Marius > > > > > On Apr 27, 1:16 pm, Timothy Perrett <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Can you be specific about which other lift artefacts you want to > replace > > > > lift:bind with? Im not fighting lift:binds corner or anything, > rather, > > > just > > > > interested to know what will supersede it because this kind of > > > functionality > > > > is key in our template strategy. > > > > > > Cheers, Tim > > > > > > On 27/04/2009 10:13, "marius d." <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > Right now: bits me ... perhaps Dave has more input. However it > seems > > > > > to me that what we can do with <lift:bind>/<lift:with-param> today, > it > > > > > can be easily done without it using the other Lift artifacts. Still > > > > > probably people got used with <lift:bind> style and finds this > pretty > > > > > handy? > > > > > > > Br's, > > > > > Marius > > > > -- > > Lift, the simply functional web frameworkhttp://liftweb.net > > Beginning Scalahttp://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 > > Follow me:http://twitter.com/dpp > > Git some:http://github.com/dpp > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
