On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Heiko Seeberger < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > As far as I understand it is not possible to specify the FQCN of a snippet > class in a snippet tag. Is this true? If so, there might be name clashes: > Just imagine popular names like user, customer, item, etc. > > This will be particularly important in the OSGi space where you can create > extensible applications: You do not know in advance, which modules are > added. > > Hence on the long run I think we need something like namespacing. What do > you think? > What do you propose as the syntax? It's possible to create page-specific snippets so a fair number of the name clashes go away, but yes, for global snippets, there might be name clashes. > > Cheers > Heiko > -- > My blog: heikoseeberger.name > Follow me: twitter.com/hseeberger > OSGi on Scala: www.scalamodules.org > Lift, the simply functional web framework: liftweb.net > > > > -- Lift, the simply functional web framework http://liftweb.net Beginning Scala http://www.apress.com/book/view/1430219890 Follow me: http://twitter.com/dpp Git some: http://github.com/dpp --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Lift" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/liftweb?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
